Friday, May 3, 2013

#2: PT scope of practice – preconceptions vs reality



Description: In a class debate on the subject of the roles of various AHPs and their relative importance in establishing and running a healthcare system isolated from outside support, my classmates and I found ourselves hard-pressed to justify the necessity of PTs in such a setting, rating doctors and nurses as more important for seeing to what were perceived as more crucial needs, such as triage and support for serious acute patients.  A conversation post-debate also mentioned a PT position in an emergency ward, which prompted some jokes from all, myself included, as none of us were able to comprehend the necessity of a PT in such a setting.

Shortly after, I saw my observational placement at an acute care ward for unscheduled surgical patients, seeing for the first time the possibilities of PTs contributing to patient care in an acute care setting by restoring post-surgical patients to levels of mobility sufficient to discharge to lower levels of care and free up ward beds for other acute patients.


Feelings: Placement was an eye-opener to me as, prior to it, I was under the impression that physiotherapy rehabilitation was strictly confined to sub-acute settings, ie. following recovery from surgery and other active short-term interventions.  At the time, I could not imagine a PT playing any role in the rehabilitation of a patient at any time before at least onset of consolidation.  

I was to learn, once a fracture was surgically reduced and fixated, loading should begin as soon as possible to maximally stimulate healthy remodelling.  Departmental policy mandated mobilisation within 24 hours of surgery where possible, which seemed highly aggressive compared to what I had learned in Atkinson(2005), in which most case studies of serious fractures of the hip and femur recommended weightbearing begin a matter of around 6 weeks post-reduction and fixation.

Evaluation: As mentioned above, I was initially apprehensive of participating in what seemed to me to be a highly aggressive course of treatment, particularly given the frail and usually aged nature of the patients, not to mention the inevitable discomfort and pain they were in so soon post-trauma, which was only aggravated by mobilisation.  However, once I was reassured by the senior therapists on the team that the patients were in no danger and would not only benefit personally from such treatment but also benefit others by freeing up highly in-demand beds, I was glad to participate in any way I could.  

Though my time at the department was relatively short, I could see from comparing patient notes that patients who had high participation in early mobilisation tended to have shorter stays than patients who were chronically immobile.  Furthermore, they tended to come to terms with their pain and discomfort better, reducing its impact on them and enabling them to sooner attain levels of mobility qualifying them for discharge from the ward. 


Analysis: Postoperative weight-bearing in stabilised hip fracture patients has been observed to achieve an average of 51% full weight-bearing one week post-surgery in one cohort of 37 patients with early post-operative mobilisation and as high as 100% full weight-bearing in another cohort of 186 patients, neither with any significant incidence of re-injury or other complications.  Having been told by the department of the high cost of bed days in the acute ward, I researched this amount and found it to vary between £364.61-367.85/bed-day nation-wide, and cost an average £12000-15000 per patient admission in Lothian.


Conclusion:  Early post-operative mobilisation to the limit of patient tolerance stands to maximise patient recovery, enabling faster processing of patients waiting for acute beds.  Less time spent in acute care will likely result in lower per-patient expenditure also, as each patient will occupy a lower number of resource-intensive acute care bed days.  Furthermore, this is a role that PTs are uniquely suited to fill, given their expected professional role as specialists in mobilisation and therapeutic exercise.  

By taking on this role, PTs will spare doctors and nurses to focus on their respective areas of patient care.  From the above, I have come to understand that PTs have a significant role to play in acute care, managing efficient and fair distribution of public healthcare expenditure by maximising patient discharge rates from resource-intensive levels of care.    




Works Cited

Atkinson, K., Coutts, F. & Hassenkamp, A.-M., 2005. Management of Fractures. In: Physiotherapy in Orthopaedics. Edinburgh: Elsevier, pp. 89-133.



 

No comments:

Post a Comment